Welche Länder Migranten nicht willkommen heißen: Wo in der EU ist die härteste Migrationspolitik jetzt?

Strenge Gesetze, geschlossene Grenzen, umstrittene Rechte. Europäische Länder ändern ihre Migrationspolitik eines nach dem anderen. Erfahren Sie, welche Länder Asyl einschränken, wo sie europäische Normen ignorieren und welche Konsequenzen dies für die Zukunft der europäischen Einheit haben könnte.

Rechtliche Unterstützung bei Migrationsfragen für Ukrainer in der Ukraine und im Ausland

HOLEN

In 2024-2025, the European Union is rapidly changing its approach to migration. A wave of political pressure, the growing popularity of right-wing parties, and public dissatisfaction with the social consequences of immigration are forcing a number of EU countries to look for new - often radical - ways to address the migration issue.

Which countries today demonstrate the toughest approach to refugees and asylum seekers? Let's analyze them further in the article.

💡Not sure about your rights abroad or don't know how to apply for asylum or a residence permit? 

Contact experienced migration lawyers - we will help you with documents, appeals and protection of your rights abroad.

Fortress Europe: the new reality of migration policy in the EU

Hungary: a pioneer in ignoring migration law

Since 2015, Hungary, under the leadership of Viktor Orban, has effectively abandoned the consideration of asylum applications. Refugees either return to Serbia or go on to other EU countries.

The European Court of Justice fined Hungary €200 million for the violation, but Budapest remains adamant that immigration issues are exclusively a matter of national sovereignty.

Poland: deportation as a state policy

Poland, particularly under the leadership of Prime Minister Donald Tusk, continues the practice of forcibly returning migrants from the border with Belarus.

Recently, the parliament passed a law that allows the right to asylum to be ignored in certain cases. This is contrary to international law, but the Polish authorities justify their actions by defending against the hybrid threat from the Kremlin.

Finland: national security comes first

Finland has passed a controversial law that allows refusing entry to refugees from russia. The law directly violates the constitution, but was passed by a majority of the parliament under the slogan of protecting national security. This approach demonstrates a new trend: states consider migration an element of a hybrid threat, not just a humanitarian issue.

Don't want to miss important updates and useful articles? Subscribe to our weekly newsletter!

Germany: legal balance on the brink

German border police have been ordered to refuse to accept new asylum applications - except in cases of extreme necessity.

This step contradicts European norms, but the CDU and other politicians refer to the right of the state to act in the interests of internal security. Although the number of applications is already decreasing, doubts remain about the legal sustainability of this approach.

Austria: restrictions on family reunification

The Austrian parliament has temporarily suspended the rule on family reunification. Although there are exceptions for minors, Vienna insists that the new measures are a response to the overloading of social infrastructures, including schools.

As in Germany, the government appeals to the exceptions provided by EU law in case of a threat to public order.

Austrian Chancellor Christian Stoker explicitly stated that the current asylum rules are “not fit for purpose” and blamed them for the increase in youth crime and the social burden on schools.

Austria has joined a group of countries calling for a revision of the European Convention on Human Rights in terms of migration. The government is seeking to gain more powers to deport migrants it considers a threat.

Belgium: as strictly as possible within the limits

The new Belgian government is acting harshly, but formally within the framework of European law. Single men seeking asylum are not always provided with housing.

The priority is to minimize the number of new applications. At the same time, Belgium has taken into account the mistakes of previous years and is now focusing on the effectiveness of the procedures already authorized.

Almost all of these countries justify their actions with security considerations, infrastructure overload, or a “demographic” argument. At the same time, they either directly violate European agreements or use their flexibility.

However, such policies pose a serious threat to the EU's legal order and may lead to the fragmentation of common migration policy.

Some countries seek revision of legislation

On May 22, nine EU countries, including Italy, Denmark, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Belgium, the Czech Republic, and Austria, signed a joint letter to the Council of Europe. They called for a “new conversation” on the application of the European Convention on Human Rights in migration issues. The document states that the current interpretation of the norms limits the sovereignty of countries and restrains them in matters of security.

Critics, however, see this initiative as a dangerous precedent. Law professors and migration law experts warn that such statements could undermine the independence of the ECHR and threaten the system of legal guarantees in Europe.

What's next?

It is expected that in the summer of 2025, a new, stricter asylum policy in the EU will come into force. It provides for the accelerated return of rejected asylum seekers and a reduction in new applications. However, many countries are already acting at their own discretion, and the European Commission has not yet demonstrated readiness to punish them.

Experts warn that political rhetoric can have the opposite effect: although the number of migrants is declining, populist statements only strengthen the position of the far right. All of this is happening against the backdrop of the upcoming elections, where the migration issue remains a political lever of influence.

The political wave that has swept across Europe calls into question the very essence of European unity - based on human rights, solidarity and respect for the rule of law. How the EU responds to these challenges may determine the future of the Union.

Tip: If you plan to stay in Europe legally after your temporary protection expires, consult with migration specialists now. Visit Ukraine lawyers advise on the rules of border crossing, paperwork in the EU, legalization of residence abroad, and other migration issues. Turning to professionals will help you avoid mistakes in the process of legalization, submission of documents or change of residence status.

We remind you! The Czech government is considering the possibility of terminating temporary protection for Ukrainian refugees in the event of a long-term ceasefire in Ukraine. Interior Minister Vit Rakusan announced plans to tighten the asylum procedure and introduce new approaches to the reception of war veterans. Read how this may affect Ukrainians in the Czech Republic in our previous article.

Want to know more? Read the latest news and useful materials about Ukraine and the world in the News section.

Our recommendation for a safe and comfortable trip: 

Visit Ukraine Insurance - insurance for a safe stay abroad without unnecessary expenses;

Green Card - compulsory car insurance for traveling abroad;

Visit Ukraine Tickets - book tickets for buses, trains, and airplanes to/from Ukraine and between cities around the world;

Private Lawyer service - professional legal support on visa and migration issues;

Visit Ukraine Merch - buy patriotic clothing and accessories with worldwide delivery.

© 2018-2025, Visit Ukraine. Use, copying or reprinting of materials on this site is permitted only with a link (hyperlink for online publications) to Visit Ukraine.

All rights reserved.